Changes of Frames – A Comparative Analysis
Main Article Content
Abstract
The paper starts from the assumption that organizational culture can be defined as the type of behavior, mainly considered in interactional terms, which is deemed acceptable by the employees (Hofstede 45). By analyzing frames, footing and their changes, the paper aims to compare the culture in two companies–a joint company (Romanian Belgium where English is used as the language of communication) and a Romanian one. The data used for the analysis come from two face-to-face meetings in these two companies.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Coposescu, Liliana and Gabriela Chefneux, eds. Institutional Talk and Intercultural Communication in Multinational Companies: Corpus of Spoken Interaction in English. Brașov: Editura Universității Transilvania din Brașov, 2008. Print.
Gheorghe, Mihaela, Stanca Măda and Răzvan Săftoiu, eds. Comunicarea la locul de muncă. Corpus de interacțiune verbală în mediul profesional. Brașov: Editura Universității Transilvania din Brașov, 2009. Print.
Goffman, Erving. Frame Analysis–An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northern University Press, 1974. Print.
Hofstede, Gert, Jan. Cultures and Organizatios: Software of the Mind. New York: McGraw-Hill,1997. Print.
Hoyle, Susan, M. “Participation Frameworks in Sportscasting Play: Imaginary and Literal Footings”. Framing in Discourse. Ed. Deborah Tannen. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993. 114-145. Print
Levinson, Stephen. “Putting Linguistics on a Proper Footing: Explorations of Goffman’s Concepts of Participation”. Erving Goffman Exploring the Interaction Order. Eds. Paul Drew and Anthony Wotton. Cambridge: Cambridge Polity Press, 1998. 161-227.Print.
Schiffrin, Deborah. “Speaking for Another in Sociolinguistic Interviews: Alignmentas, Identities and Frames”. Framing in Discourse. Ed. Deborah Tannen. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993. 231-262. Print.
Straehle, Carolyn.”’Samuel’. ‘Yes, dear?’ Teasing and Conversational Rapport”. Framing in Discourse. Ed. Deborah Tannen New York: Oxford University Press, 1993. 210-230. Print.
Tannen, Deborah. “What’s in a Frame? Surface Evidence for Underlying Expectations “. Framing in Discourse. Ed. Deborah Tannen. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993. 14-56. Print.
Tannen, Deborah. That’s Not What I Mean. London: Virago Press. 1998. Print.
Tannen, Deborah and Cynthia Wallat. “Interactive Frames and Knowledge Schemas in Interaction; Examples from a Medical Examination/Iinterview”. Framing in Discourse. Ed. Deborah Tannen. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993. 57-76. Print.