Changes of Frames – A Comparative Analysis

Main Article Content

Gabriela Chefneux

Abstract

The paper starts from the assumption that organizational culture can be defined as the type of behavior, mainly considered in interactional terms, which is deemed acceptable by the employees (Hofstede 45). By analyzing frames, footing and their changes, the paper aims to compare the culture in two companies–a joint company (Romanian Belgium where English is used as the language of communication) and a Romanian one. The data used for the analysis come from two face-to-face meetings in these two companies.

Article Details

How to Cite
Chefneux, G. “Changes of Frames – A Comparative Analysis”. Linguaculture, vol. 9, no. 1, June 2018, pp. 9-26, doi:10.47743/lincu-2018-1-0110.
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Gabriela Chefneux, Transilvania University of Braşov, Romania

Gabriela Chefneux is a professor in the Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, the Faculty of Letters, Transilvania University of Braşov. Her most recent publications are dedicated to the analysis of institutional talk, including the representation of power and the presence and functions of humour. She is currently working on the presence and perception of immigrants in newspapers.

References

Coposescu, Liliana and Gabriela Chefneux, eds. Institutional Talk and Intercultural Communication in Multinational Companies: Corpus of Spoken Interaction in English. Brașov: Editura Universității Transilvania din Brașov, 2008. Print.

Gheorghe, Mihaela, Stanca Măda and Răzvan Săftoiu, eds. Comunicarea la locul de muncă. Corpus de interacțiune verbală în mediul profesional. Brașov: Editura Universității Transilvania din Brașov, 2009. Print.

Goffman, Erving. Frame Analysis–An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northern University Press, 1974. Print.

Hofstede, Gert, Jan. Cultures and Organizatios: Software of the Mind. New York: McGraw-Hill,1997. Print.

Hoyle, Susan, M. “Participation Frameworks in Sportscasting Play: Imaginary and Literal Footings”. Framing in Discourse. Ed. Deborah Tannen. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993. 114-145. Print

Levinson, Stephen. “Putting Linguistics on a Proper Footing: Explorations of Goffman’s Concepts of Participation”. Erving Goffman Exploring the Interaction Order. Eds. Paul Drew and Anthony Wotton. Cambridge: Cambridge Polity Press, 1998. 161-227.Print.

Schiffrin, Deborah. “Speaking for Another in Sociolinguistic Interviews: Alignmentas, Identities and Frames”. Framing in Discourse. Ed. Deborah Tannen. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993. 231-262. Print.

Straehle, Carolyn.”’Samuel’. ‘Yes, dear?’ Teasing and Conversational Rapport”. Framing in Discourse. Ed. Deborah Tannen New York: Oxford University Press, 1993. 210-230. Print.

Tannen, Deborah. “What’s in a Frame? Surface Evidence for Underlying Expectations “. Framing in Discourse. Ed. Deborah Tannen. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993. 14-56. Print.

Tannen, Deborah. That’s Not What I Mean. London: Virago Press. 1998. Print.

Tannen, Deborah and Cynthia Wallat. “Interactive Frames and Knowledge Schemas in Interaction; Examples from a Medical Examination/Iinterview”. Framing in Discourse. Ed. Deborah Tannen. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993. 57-76. Print.