Semantic Primes of Perception from the Perspective of Word Formation

Main Article Content

Anna Zaslonkina

Abstract

The object of the present study is the domain of Greimassian semiotic theory. Several previous findings on supraindividual phenomena were summarized and theoretical underpinnings of the soi-disant thymic category were extended. Investigation of such an object discloses the relation between the experiential (which approximates sensational) and cognitive nature of perception. Whereas conceptual universals that bear the information on feelings, senses and emotions as those inherent in the corporal framework and correspond to the basic level of categorization have already been demonstrated, their iconic efficiency in terms of Piercian semiotics is still unclear. Therefore, the aim of the current analysis is to clarify structural-semantic links between derived and root words constituting the thymic lexical corpus of modern English. This paper emphasizes the importance of understanding how the motivational means conditioned by the classification of associative-figurative and evaluative features of the conceptual triad SENSE: FEELING: EMOTION are exteriorised within the thymic category. These characteristics can be developed and enhanced through the iconic reflection of the correlation between the native speakers’ evaluation of the sign acting as a motivator and expressive as well as gnoseological functions of perception.

Article Details

How to Cite
Zaslonkina, A. “Semantic Primes of Perception from the Perspective of Word Formation”. Linguaculture, vol. 9, no. 1, June 2018, pp. 55-68, doi:10.47743/lincu-2018-1-0113.
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Anna Zaslonkina, Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University, Ukraine

Anna Zaslonkina is a senior lecturer in the Department of English at Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University, Ukraine. She obtained her PhD in 2015 with a thesis entitled English Thymic Lexis as the Objectifier of Concepts SENSE: FEELING: EMOTION (in Ukrainian). During the last twelve years she has worked on a variety of courses including Cognitive Linguistics, Semiotics, and Translation Studies. Her primary area of scholarly research is the anthropocentric paradigm centered on the categories of observer and observable, where/ the human organism is viewed as a holistic basis for construing divergent phenomena of perception. This linguistic principle was reflected in a number of her publications among which Performance of Perception: the Semiotics of the Sensible and Beyond (2017), a description of the cognitive mechanisms determining the arrangement of morphological parameters of the thymic verbs, The Conceptual Outline of Perception in Terms of Greimassian Semiotic Theory (2018), an extension of the previous research in the area examining collocability patterns of the thymic category members.

References

Anderson, John Mathieson. Linguistic Representation (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and monographs). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2011. Print.

Arutiunova, Nina. Tipy jazykovyh znachenij. Ocenka. Sobytie. Fact. [Types of Linguistic Meanings. Evaluation. Event. Fact]. Moscow: Nauka, 1988. Print.

Benedetti, Giulio. “The semantics of the fundamental elements of language in Ernst von Glaserfeld’s work.” Constructivist Foundations 6.2 (2011): 213-219. Print.

Damasio, Antonio. The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1999. Print.

Fauconnier, Gilles. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Print.

Gärdenfors, Peter. Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2000. Print.

Greimas, Aigirdas J. and Fontanille Jacques. Semiotika strastej. Ot sostojanija veshchej k sostojaniju dushy. [Semiotics of the Sensible. From the State of Matter to the State of Mind]. (I.G. Merkulova, Transl.). Moscow: URSS, 2007. Print.

Jakobson, Roman. “World and Language.” Selected Writings in 6 volumes (Volume II). Ed. Stephen Rudy. Paris: Mouton, 1971. Print.

“Knowledge”, “Information”, “Consciousness”. Kratkij slovar cognitivnyh terminov. [Concise Dictionary of Cognitive Terms]. Ed. Elena Kubryakova. Moscow: MGU, 1997. Print.

(Authors not given.) Kravchenko, Alexandr. Znak, znachenie, znanie. Ocherk kognitivnoj filosofii jazyka. [Sign, Meaning, Knowledge. The Outline of Cognitive Philosophy of Language]. Irkutsk: OGUP, 2001. Print.

Kubryakova, Elena. Jazyk i znanie. [Language and Knowledge]. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kultury, 2004. Print.

Lakoff, George. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987. Print.

Lukjanova, Nina. Ekspressivnaja leksika razgovornogo upotreblenija: Problemy semantiki. [Expressive Conversation Vocabulary: Issues of Semantics]. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1986. Print.

Lyons, John. Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995. Print.

Ohuy, Olexandr. “Linhvistychna teorija znaka v epistemolohichnomu rakursi.” [Linguistic Theory of the Sign from the Perspective of Epistemology]. Visnyk Zhytomyrskoho universytetu imeni I. Franka 62 (2012): 22-26. Print.

Pierce, Charles. Izbarannye filosofskie proizvedenija. [Selected Works on Philosophy]. (N. Golubovich, Transl.). Moscow: Logos, 2000. Print.

Poliuzhyn, Mykhailo. Funkcionalnyj i kohnityvnyj aspekty anhlijskoho slovotvorennja. [Functional and Cognitive Aspects of the English Word-Formation]. Uzhhorod: Zakarpattya, 1999. Print.

Poznanski, Roman R. “Towards an integrative theory of cognition.” Journal of Integrative Neuroscience 01.02 (2002): 145-156. Print.

Pryhodko, Anatolij. Koncepty i konceptosystemy v cohnityvno-dyskursyvnij paradyhmi linhvistyky. [Concepts and Conceptual Systems in the Cognitive-Discoursive Paradigm of Linguistics]. Zaporizhzhya: Premier, 2008. Print.

Putiy, Olena. “Konceptopole ʼantropologicheskoe sostojanieʼ (na materiale nemeckogo jazyka).” [The Conceptual Field “Anthropological State” A Case Study of German Language]. Nova filolohija 24 (2006): 95-102. Print.

Schleifer, Ronald. “The semiotics of sensation: A. J. Greimas and the experience of meaning.” Semiotica 2017.214 (2017): 173-192. Print.

Sechehaye, Albert. Programma i metody teoretičeskoj lingvistiki: psihologija jazyka. [Programme and Methods of Theoretical Linguistics: Psychology of Language]. (V.M. Alpatov, Transl.). Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2003. Print.

Selivanova, Olena. “Classeme.” Suchasna linhvistyka: terminolohichna encyklopedija. [Modern Linguistics: Terminological Encyclopaedia]. Poltava: Dovkillja-K, 2006. Print.

Serebrennikov, Boris and Elena Kubryakova, eds. Rol chelovecheskogo factora v jazyke: Jazyk I myshlenie. [The Role of Human Factor in Language: Language and Thinking]. Moscow: Nauka, 1988. Print.

British National Corpus (BYU-BNC). Corpus.byu.edu. Web. 25 September 2017. Toporova, Valentina. “Konceptualno-semanticeskij blok kak edinica lingvisticeskogo opisanija” [Conceptual-Semantic Block as a Unit of Linguistic Description]. International Congress on Cognitive Linguistics Ed. Nikolaj Boldyrev. (2008): 89-91. Print.

Ufimceva, Anna. Tipy slovesnyh znakov. [Types of Verbal Signs]. Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2004. Print.

Volf, Elena. Funkcionalnaja semantika ocenki. [Functional Semantics of Evaluation]. 2nd ed. Moscow: URSS, 2002. Print.