Does Translation (Ex)Change Everything? A Framework for Political Translation

Article Sidebar

Open / Download PDF
Published: Dec 10, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47743/lincu-2018-2-0129
Keywords:
political discourse political translation hiding and highlighting strategies

Main Article Content

Titela Vîlceanu
University of Craiova, Romania

Abstract

The paper focuses on the translation of the political discourse, embedding linguistic and cross-cultural perspectives. The choice is motivated by the fact that in the first decades of the new millenium we have witnessed an exponential increase in the quantity, quality and urgency of this discourse within the international political sphere. The political discourse can be said to unearthen the hidden agenda of the contemporary large-scale crises: the financial crisis, shifts of power, terrorist attacks, etc. In this light, the question arises: Does translation objectively and accurately reflect the strategies in the discourse of political leaders, and the problematisation of supranational identities such as the European one (more specifically, referring to membership to the European Union)? Answers to such questions are attempted starting from the premise that the translation of the political discourse or political translation (Trosborg, 1997; Biel, 2017) is an emerging sub-type of institutional translation struggling to assert its own identity. Keywords: political discourse; political translation; hiding and highlighting strategies

Article Details

How to Cite
Vîlceanu, T. “Does Translation (Ex)Change Everything? A Framework for Political Translation”. Linguaculture, vol. 9, no. 2, Dec. 2018, pp. 146-55, doi:10.47743/lincu-2018-2-0129.
Issue
Vol. 9 No. 2 (2018)
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Author Biography

Titela Vîlceanu, University of Craiova, Romania

Titela VÎLCEANU is an Associate Professor and Doctoral supervisor at the Department of British, American and German Studies, Faculty of Letters; Director of The Translatio Centre for Translation, Communication and Interpretation, University of Craiova. In February 2017 she was elected Chair of RSEAS (The Romanian Society for English and American Studies) and Member of the ESSE Board (The European Society for the Study of English). Her research focus is on translation studies, pragmatics, intercultural communication, and legal English. She is also a methodologist accredited by the British Council Romania and by the University of Edinburgh, Institute for Applied Language Studies, a Romanian language linguistic administrator (AD5) in the field of translation, certified by the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)-European Commission, a Bologna expert certified by EACEA, and an ARACIS (Romanian Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education) evaluator in the field of Applied Modern Languages, as well as an international evaluator with other bodies. She has attended numerous international conferences in Romania and abroad and authored more than 60 articles and 5 books. She has participated in 12 international interdisciplinary research programmes.

References

Biel, Łucja. “Quality in Institutional EU Translation: Parameters, Policies and Practices”. Quality Aspects in Institutional Translation. Eds. Tomáš Svoboda , Łucja Biel, Krzysztof Łoboda. Berlin: Language Science Press. 2017. pp. 31-57. DOI:10.5281/zenodo.1048183.

Blommaert, Jan, Bulcaen, Chris, eds. Political Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1997. Print.

Chesterman, Andrew. “The name and nature of translator studies”. Hermes – Journal of Language and Communication 42, 2009. pp. 13– 22. Print.

Chilton, Paul, Schäffner, Cristina, eds. Politics as Text and Talk. Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2002. Print.

Chilton, Paul. Analysing Political Disourse. Theory and Practice. London and New York: Routledge, 2004. Print.

Cohen, Eli B., Lloyd, Scott. “Disciplinary Evolution and the Rise of the Transdiscipline”. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 17, 2014. pp. 189-215. Print.

Fairclough, Norman. CriticalDiscourse Analysis. Boston: Addison Wesley, 1995. Print.

Fairclough, Isabela, Fairclough, Norman. Political Discourse Analysis. A Method for Advanced Students. London and New York: Routledge, 2012. Print.

Fetzer, Anita. “The multilayered and multifaceted nature of political discourse”. The Pragmatics of Political Discourse. Ed. Anita Fetzer. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2013. pp. 1-21. Print.

Fløttum, Kjersti. “Speaking of and within the EU – Introduction”. Speaking of Europe. Approaches to Complexity in European Political Discourse.Ed. Kjersti Fløttum. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2013. pp. 1-19. Print.

Habermas, Jürgen. “Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research”. Communication Theory 16, 2006. pp. 411–426. Print.

Halverson, Sandra. “Reorienting Translation Studies: Cognitive Approaches and the Centrality of the Translator”. Translation: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Ed. Juliane House, 2014. Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan, pp.117-139. Print.

Hepp, A. et al. The Communicative Construction of Europe. Cultures of Political Discourse, Public Sphere and the Euro Crisis. Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan, 2016. Print.

House, Juliane. “Text and Context in Translation”. Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 3. 2006. pp. 338-358. Print.

Koopmans, Ruud, Statham, Paul. “Theoretical Framework, Research Design, and Methods”. The Making of a European Public Sphere. Media Discourse and Political Contention. Eds. Ruud Koopmans, Paul Statham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 34-59. Print.

Mason, Ian. “Text parameters in translation: transitivity and institutional cultures”. The Translation Studies Reader. Ed. Lawrence Venuti, 2004. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 470-481. Print.

Okulska, Urszula, Cap, Piotr. Perspectives in Politics and Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2010. Print.

Sárosi-Márdirosz, Krisztina. “Problems Related to the Translation of Political Texts”. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica, 6, 2. 2014. pp. 159–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ausp-2015-0012.

Strömbäck, Jesper. “Mediatization of Politics: towards a conceptual framework for comparative research.” Sourcebook for Political Communication Research: methods, measures, and analytical techniques. Eds. Erik P. Bucy and R. Lance Holbert. New York: Routledge, 2010. pp. 367-382. Print.

Trosborg, Anna. “Translating Hybrid Political Texts”. Text Typology and Translation. Ed. Anna Trosborg. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 1145-158. 2017. Print.

van Dijk, Teun A. “What is Political Discourse Analysis?”. Political Linguistics. Eds. Jan Blommaert and Chris Bulcaen. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1997. pp. 11-52. Print.

Wessler, Hartmut et al. Transnationalization of public spheres. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008. Print.

Wodak, Ruth, Chilton, Paul, eds. A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2005. Print.

Most read articles by the same author(s)